About Loom
Key Features
- Instant screen + camera recording from browser or desktop
- Auto-generated links copied on finish — no uploads
- AI titles, summaries, chapters, and filler-word removal
- Viewer analytics showing who watched what
- Comments, emoji reactions, and CTA buttons on videos
- Transcriptions in 50+ languages
- Team libraries and workspace organization
- Atlassian integration surfacing videos in Jira and Confluence
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Fastest record-to-share workflow anywhere
- AI editing makes rough takes shareable
- Viewer analytics prove whether anyone watched
- Free tier fine for light personal use
- Deep Atlassian ecosystem integration since acquisition
Cons
- Free tier caps: 25 videos at 5 minutes each
- Editing remains basic beyond AI trims
- Business features require ~$15/user/month
- Recordings live in Loom’s cloud only
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Loom used for?
Is Loom free?
Can viewers watch Loom videos without an account?
Does Loom have AI features?
Is Loom secure for company use?
Reviews
Similar Tools
Best For
Loom is best for remote teams, support staff, and educators replacing meetings with quick screen recordings — explain once on video, share a link, and let people watch on their own time.
Use Cases
Replacing status meetings with async video updates
Bug reports showing exactly what went wrong on screen
Customer support walkthroughs answering questions visually
Onboarding and training libraries for new hires
Sales prospecting videos that stand out in inboxes
Pricing Details
Loom free allows 25 videos of up to 5 minutes each — enough to trial the habit. Business costs about $15/user/month (annual) for unlimited videos and recording length; Business + AI about $20 adds the full AI suite. Enterprise brings SSO and governance. Education accounts get generous free access.
Security & Trust
Loom (an Atlassian company) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification, encrypts video in transit and at rest, and offers workspace-level sharing controls, password-protected links, and SSO on higher tiers. Default link-sharing is convenient but open — set workspace policies so sensitive recordings aren’t one forward away from public.
Alternatives To Consider
Free OS tools (Windows Game Bar, macOS screen recording) cover raw capture without the sharing layer. Scribe generates step-by-step written guides instead of video, often better for documentation. Zight and Vidyard compete feature-for-feature, while CapCut or Descript serve when real editing matters.
Editorial Verdict
Loom owns the async-video habit — nothing else makes “record, link, done” this frictionless, and the AI cleanup genuinely rescues one-take recordings. The free tier is now tight and per-seat pricing adds up. For distributed teams, it eliminates enough meetings to pay for itself.
Sources & Review Notes
Last reviewed: July 26, 2026