This page lists 189 companies tagged for software development. It is ranked by client rating weighted for review volume, using public ratings and review counts. Filter by country, hourly-rate band and team size, then open a profile to check the company’s service mix, project evidence and the source behind its figures. A review score cannot tell you which team fits your product or how a project will perform.
Software Development profile for WPWeb Infotech. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for KITRUM. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for CodeNinja. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Andersen Inc.. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Linnify. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Share a two-minute brief and only companies that fit it will contact you. Free, no obligation.
Software Development profile for Neologic Custom Software. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
AI Development profile for 10Clouds. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for SapientPro. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Digis, a Fiverr company (NYSE: FVRR). Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Widelab. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for DreamzTech Solutions. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Redlab agency. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for BEON.tech. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for eSparkBiz. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Bilberrry. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Uvik Software. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
AI Development profile for Fingent. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for fxis.ai. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Cheesecake Labs – AI, Data, & Product. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Dotlogics. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Software Mind S.A.. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Experion Technologies. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Flexy Global. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for Plego. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Software Development profile for THEY.dev. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
By client rating, weighted for how many reviews stand behind it. A company rated 4.9 across 149 reviews ranks above one rated 5.0 across 8, because the larger sample tells you more. Nothing else moves a company up or down. The criteria below are what to check on each profile before you shortlist.
Compare ratings and review counts together. A star score is one signal, not a technical assessment.
Open case studies and confirm the firm’s role, project scope and result.
Compare published hourly bands and minimums; ask what is excluded.
Confirm who will work on your project, their availability and who remains accountable after launch.
Ask how the proposed service maps to your requirements and which dependencies or risks are outside scope.
Score = (reviews × rating + 25 × 4.5) ÷ (reviews + 25)
A company is treated as close to 4.5 stars until it has more than 25 reviews, after which its own rating takes over. Placement cannot be purchased.
Software development can mean a new product, a rebuild, a system integration or extra engineers for an existing team. Write down the users, the workflows the software must support, the systems it needs to connect to, and what a successful first release would do. If the requirements are still changing, ask vendors to price discovery separately and state what assumptions they used.
Ask for examples that resemble your product’s complexity, integrations or operating constraints. Find out what the vendor’s own team delivered, what other suppliers handled, whether the work is in production, and how the result was evaluated. A technology tag on a profile is a useful prompt for questions; it is not proof of recent delivery in your environment.
Confirm who will lead the work, which roles are actually available, and whether the people you meet will be the people who build it. Discuss code and intellectual-property ownership, repository access, documentation, deployment responsibilities and support after launch. For staff augmentation, agree how the engineers will work with your existing product owner and technical lead.
An hourly band is not a full project estimate. Ask how team seniority, discovery, integrations, data migration, testing, security work and ongoing support affect the proposal. Request the minimum engagement, exclusions, billing assumptions and any recurring infrastructure or licensing costs in writing.
Ask what code review, testing, dependency checks and vulnerability response are part of the vendor’s normal process. NIST’s Secure Software Development Framework provides a shared vocabulary for these conversations; a reference to it is not a certification. Ask the vendor to describe the practices it actually follows and the evidence it can share.
The default order weights public ratings by review volume. That helps describe review evidence, but it does not measure engineering quality or tell you whether a team fits your project. Use the filters to form a shortlist, then compare scope, relevant work, delivery team and commercial assumptions in the company profiles and proposals.
Describe the users, key workflows, systems to integrate, constraints, first-release goals, available team, timeline and budget. Include security, accessibility, data migration or compliance requirements if they affect the work.
The default order weights public ratings by review volume. It summarizes review evidence; it is not a technical assessment or a promise of project results. Check relevant work and team fit separately.
No. They are published rate ranges, not quotes. Team mix, discovery, integrations, testing, migration and post-launch support affect total cost. Ask vendors to state assumptions, exclusions and recurring charges.
Submit a company profile for consideration. This directory’s order follows its stated review-data method; a paid promotion does not buy a higher position.
Let us do the hard work for you — we will find the perfect partner for your project.
Filling in the brief does not oblige you to hire anyone.