Compare 327 companies tagged for Mobile App Development. Listings are ordered by public client ratings weighted by review volume, not by an independent test of app quality. Filter by country, hourly rate and team size, then check platform experience, shipped examples, maintenance scope and the evidence behind each profile.
Mobile App Development profile for Empat. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Trigma. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Helpful Insight Private Limited. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Tridhya Tech Limited. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for JPLoft. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Share a two-minute brief and only companies that fit it will contact you. Free, no obligation.
Mobile App Development profile for WOLFPACK DIGITAL. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Orases. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for itCraft. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Lizard Global. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for TechnoYuga. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Aalpha Information Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for AgileEngine. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Digital Heroes. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for unicrew. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for EB Pearls. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for mobitouch. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for You are launched. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Dedicated Developers. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Rubyroid Labs. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Emizen Tech. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Paracon Consultants Corp.. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Lumitech. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for NERDZ LAB. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for SpaceDev. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
Mobile App Development profile for Phenomenon Studio. Compare listed services, team details, rates and relevant project evidence before shortlisting.
By client rating, weighted for how many reviews stand behind it. A company rated 4.9 across 149 reviews ranks above one rated 5.0 across 8, because the larger sample tells you more. Nothing else moves a company up or down. The criteria below are what to check on each profile before you shortlist.
Compare ratings and review counts together. A star score is one signal, not a technical assessment.
Open case studies and confirm the firm’s role, project scope and result.
Compare published hourly bands and minimums; ask what is excluded.
Confirm who will work on your project, their availability and who remains accountable after launch.
Ask how the proposed service maps to your requirements and which dependencies or risks are outside scope.
Score = (reviews × rating + 25 × 4.5) ÷ (reviews + 25)
A company is treated as close to 4.5 stars until it has more than 25 reviews, after which its own rating takes over. Placement cannot be purchased.
Write down the users, the main task they need to complete, and what a successful launch would change for the business. That helps separate a focused first release from features that can wait. Ask providers to explain trade-offs when they recommend native iOS and Android apps, a shared codebase, or a mobile web experience. The right choice depends on device features, user needs, budget and the team that will maintain it.
Look beyond polished screenshots. Ask to see a live app or a walkthrough of a project with similar workflows, integrations or constraints. Find out what the provider delivered, which parts were handled by others, and who from the proposed team did the work. If a case study reports a business result, ask how it was measured and over what period.
Agree on supported operating system versions, devices, testing responsibilities, store submission, analytics, crash monitoring and post-launch support. Ask who owns the source code, design files, developer accounts and signing credentials. A low build estimate can omit testing, store review changes, infrastructure or routine updates, so compare the full first-year cost.
Ask how permissions are justified, what data the app collects, how it is stored, and how users can delete it. Apple’s App Review guidance asks developers to explain data use and minimize unnecessary access. For Android, Google publishes core and adaptive app quality guidance for different screen sizes and device types. W3C’s mobile accessibility guidance explains how WCAG applies across mobile web, native and hybrid experiences; it is guidance, not a complete app certification. Apple App Review, Android app quality, and W3C mobile guidance are useful starting points.
Ask who will make technical decisions, how changes are approved, and what documentation and handover are included. MatchFast sorts this directory using public rating and review-volume data; the order does not establish platform expertise or predict your project outcome. Verify claims with relevant examples, references and a proposal tied to your requirements.
Ask providers to compare the options against your required device features, user experience, release plan and maintenance capacity. There is no single best choice for every product.
Look for scope, platforms, milestones, named team, testing, store submission, ownership, support and exclusions. Confirm how changes and third-party costs are handled.
No. Directory ordering uses public review data. Check provider profiles and independently verify relevant work and team experience.
Submit a company profile for consideration. This directory’s order follows its stated review-data method; a paid promotion does not buy a higher position.
Let us do the hard work for you — we will find the perfect partner for your project.
Filling in the brief does not oblige you to hire anyone.