Lickability

Considering Lickability for technology services work? MatchFast lists the company under technology services. Those two facts are the same fact: this is a senior iOS boutique with no junior bench to average the rate down. Roughly 70% of its work is mobile app development, the highest concentration of any firm in the New York top ten. The model is embedding with in-house teams rather than taking whole builds off your hands — several reviews describe ongoing staff augmentation where Lickability engineers deliver technical work alongside the client's own developers. Local clients rate quality 5.0, willingness to refer 5.0, schedule 4.9 and cost 4.8. Reviewers repeatedly note accurate estimates and on-budget delivery, which is unusual praise in this category and worth more than the hourly rate suggests. Best for: native iOS depth, and augmenting a team that already has a product in market. Consider alternatives if: you need a full team covering Android, design and QA under one roof, or you are starting from zero. Treat directory labels and the summary as a starting point; they do not establish that a team has worked on your exact problem. Ask for a recent project similar to your scope, the names or roles of the people who would deliver it, clear milestones, and the support included after handover. Compare the rate range, team information and project evidence shown below, and confirm current terms and source review details with the provider before deciding.

Best suited to native iOS depth and augmenting teams that already have a product in market.

1 of 5 verified. The rest are supplied by the listing owner. Last checked 22 August 2026.

• ✓Rating and review count read from a live third-party profile
• Rate band, team size and founding year cross-checked
• Working website on the company own domain
• Portfolio and named clients supplied
• Named leadership on record